Alabama senator proposes significant fixes for Gulf red snapper mess
WASHINGTON, DC (12-16-15) – Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) made clear in June that he intended to level the playing field for recreational anglers in the Gulf of Mexico by inserting several provisions dealing specifically with red snapper into the Fiscal Year 2016 appropriations bill. With introduction of the Congressional Omnibus Appropriations bill today, Sen. Shelby strengthened his commitment to fight for anglers with specific language on state boundaries as well as red snapper allocation and stock assessments.
“Senator Shelby's leadership and commitment to tackling the challenges facing the red snapper fishery has paid off,” said Mitch Brownlee, chairman of Coastal Conservation Association. “ The provisions authored by Sen. Shelby included in the omnibus, specifically ensuring that the red snapper stocks are properly counted, that there is more local involvement in the process, and moving the state boundary lines from three to nine miles, are huge wins for fishermen across the Gulf. CCA is very grateful for Sen. Shelby's continued efforts, and we are optimistic that these changes will lead to what we all hope for – a longer fishing season."
NEW ORLEANS (10-28-15) – Coastal Conservation Association made its case today against Amendment 40 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico during oral arguments in U.S. District Court in New Orleans. CCA has been a vocal opponent of NOAA Fisheries’ action to create a new charter/for-hire sector in the red snapper fishery and reserve a significant percentage of the recreational quota solely for its use.
“After oral arguments today, we are hopeful that the Court will set aside the agency’s highly controversial management plan for Gulf of Mexico red snapper,” said Mitch Brownlee, chairman of CCA National. “In forcing this unpopular plan through the management system, NOAA Fisheries ignored overwhelming public opposition to appease certain for-profit stakeholders at the expense of the angling public. This is clearly not the way to manage public marine resources.”